Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > CCC/MTD Cub Cadet built Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #121  
Old 05-03-2017, 06:07 PM
dodge trucker dodge trucker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Illinois
Posts: 641
Default

another tip; If there is a gasket available for something, USE IT!!! DON'T substitute RTV for a gasket.
Reply With Quote
  #122  
Old 05-03-2017, 07:34 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dodge trucker View Post
another tip; If there is a gasket available for something, USE IT!!! DON'T substitute RTV for a gasket.
Depending on application, I would. The RTV that is made now is good, and there are other sealers. I haven't used gaskets on the rear covers for years. No leaks since switching.

The newer engines don't have many gaskets. Most of a Duramax diesel is sealed up with silicone. The rest of the gaskets are stamped metal, no "gasket" material used. Silicone is becoming the common sealant used.
Reply With Quote
  #123  
Old 05-03-2017, 10:10 PM
CubDieselFan's Avatar
CubDieselFan CubDieselFan is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 2,373
Default

I work at a engine plant. We use Three Bond FIPG and we use robots to dispense it. It is different product for oil or water. There are a few gaskets but not many. We spray water on the lower oil pan to help it cure faster. We thought it was the dumbest idea we had ever seen, leaks went to zero. There was not enough time between leak test and lower oil pan installation.
__________________
1572, 1864 x2, 1810 x2, 1863 & GT1554(Dad's Ole Mowers), 1811,782D, 1872 x2, 782DT(Sold), 3235, 1860, 1772 with 3-point and Turbo.
Reply With Quote
  #124  
Old 05-03-2017, 11:31 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CubDieselFan View Post
I work at a engine plant. We use Three Bond FIPG and we use robots to dispense it. It is different product for oil or water. There are a few gaskets but not many. We spray water on the lower oil pan to help it cure faster. We thought it was the dumbest idea we had ever seen, leaks went to zero. There was not enough time between leak test and lower oil pan installation.

There it is! That's cool.

Can you say who's engine plant? Gas or diesel? What engine? Anything? I'm curious now. In Tennessee, I'm assuming either Nissan or GM.



Not to get off topic or anything, but as a mechanic, I've always found it amazing the mass production process of assembling an engine. Just really amazing that they assemble them so fast and they run as long as they do. Comparatively, it takes forever to do a good rebuild of a motor in a shop. Sure, a lot of that is parts cleaning and machine work.... but even if you have everything sitting there it still takes quite a while to assemble one. You mechanics know what I mean. I mean.... how many motor are assembled in the factory a day? Hundreds right?
Reply With Quote
  #125  
Old 05-04-2017, 07:12 AM
sorner's Avatar
sorner sorner is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,331
Default

I pulled a late night last night and got this thing installed and filled up. Plumbing is all reconnected and linkages too. I went down to look this morning for leaks and so far its bone dry. I'll recheck the bolt torques to check for carrier and rear cover gasket crushing and make sure they're still snug.

IMG_3639.jpg

It's about ready to put wheels on and push it outside to pressure spray areas I couldn't get to with the fender on before I reassemble any further.
Reply With Quote
  #126  
Old 05-04-2017, 07:25 AM
sorner's Avatar
sorner sorner is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,331
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
There it is! That's cool.

Can you say who's engine plant? Gas or diesel? What engine? Anything? I'm curious now. In Tennessee, I'm assuming either Nissan or GM.



Not to get off topic or anything, but as a mechanic, I've always found it amazing the mass production process of assembling an engine. Just really amazing that they assemble them so fast and they run as long as they do. Comparatively, it takes forever to do a good rebuild of a motor in a shop. Sure, a lot of that is parts cleaning and machine work.... but even if you have everything sitting there it still takes quite a while to assemble one. You mechanics know what I mean. I mean.... how many motor are assembled in the factory a day? Hundreds right?
I've often wondered that also. I have a Dodge Intrepid that originally came with a 2.7L engine which were junk. They have a water pump issue that when the pump starts to go it leaks antifreeze into the oil pan directly and you don't know it unless you're either lucky to catch it or your motor is blown. I bought it from my company (it was a company car) and the engine blew at 51k miles. The best way to fix those is to replace it with a 3.2L which doesn't have this issue. It's almost a direct swap. The first time I did it was when I got the car in 2004 (it was a 2001). The second time (after I put 160k on the replaced motor) in 2014 something let go internally. I tried taking the top end apart and it took me 3 days just to get into the valves because of all the crap bolted to the top of the engine. I gave up and did another engine swap. I swapped the whole engine in 3 days. The same amount of time it took me to get inside the engine, and I still wasn't far enough to see anything. I see engine design and assembly as something of a masterpiece I guess, and I curse that masterpiece almost every time I have to work on something on it because it's either impossible to get to or rusted tight. I don't know how they do it... But the car is still going strong now with almost 240k. It doesn't look or sound a mile over 100k.
Reply With Quote
  #127  
Old 05-04-2017, 07:30 AM
ol'George's Avatar
ol'George ol'George is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 6,892
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
There it is! That's cool.

Can you say who's engine plant? Gas or diesel? What engine? Anything? I'm curious now. In Tennessee, I'm assuming either Nissan or GM.



Not to get off topic or anything, but as a mechanic, I've always found it amazing the mass production process of assembling an engine. Just really amazing that they assemble them so fast and they run as long as they do. Comparatively, it takes forever to do a good rebuild of a motor in a shop. Sure, a lot of that is parts cleaning and machine work.... but even if you have everything sitting there it still takes quite a while to assemble one. You mechanics know what I mean. I mean.... how many motor are assembled in the factory a day? Hundreds right?
Sealants have cut assy time drastically as well as robotic application of them as mentioned.
And that is why a crate engine today, is less costly than rebuilding by a "mechanic"
I've seen a tremendous change in things just since the early 1960's
(sorry for the hijack)
Reply With Quote
  #128  
Old 05-04-2017, 08:48 AM
CubDieselFan's Avatar
CubDieselFan CubDieselFan is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 2,373
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
There it is! That's cool.

Can you say who's engine plant? Gas or diesel? What engine? Anything? I'm curious now. In Tennessee, I'm assuming either Nissan or GM.



Not to get off topic or anything, but as a mechanic, I've always found it amazing the mass production process of assembling an engine. Just really amazing that they assemble them so fast and they run as long as they do. Comparatively, it takes forever to do a good rebuild of a motor in a shop. Sure, a lot of that is parts cleaning and machine work.... but even if you have everything sitting there it still takes quite a while to assemble one. You mechanics know what I mean. I mean.... how many motor are assembled in the factory a day? Hundreds right?
I started a new thread in the general talk area for those interested.
__________________
1572, 1864 x2, 1810 x2, 1863 & GT1554(Dad's Ole Mowers), 1811,782D, 1872 x2, 782DT(Sold), 3235, 1860, 1772 with 3-point and Turbo.
Reply With Quote
  #129  
Old 05-04-2017, 01:12 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorner View Post
I'll recheck the bolt torques to check for carrier and rear cover gasket crushing and make sure they're still snug.
Do not do that. Those gaskets do not need to be crushed further. Kohler head gaskets are the one of the few things that need retorqued. Everything else is fine after the first time. Just leave it alone.
Reply With Quote
  #130  
Old 05-04-2017, 01:18 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorner View Post
I've often wondered that also. I have a Dodge Intrepid that originally came with a 2.7L engine which were junk. They have a water pump issue that when the pump starts to go it leaks antifreeze into the oil pan directly and you don't know it unless you're either lucky to catch it or your motor is blown. I bought it from my company (it was a company car) and the engine blew at 51k miles. The best way to fix those is to replace it with a 3.2L which doesn't have this issue. It's almost a direct swap. The first time I did it was when I got the car in 2004 (it was a 2001). The second time (after I put 160k on the replaced motor) in 2014 something let go internally. I tried taking the top end apart and it took me 3 days just to get into the valves because of all the crap bolted to the top of the engine. I gave up and did another engine swap. I swapped the whole engine in 3 days. The same amount of time it took me to get inside the engine, and I still wasn't far enough to see anything. I see engine design and assembly as something of a masterpiece I guess, and I curse that masterpiece almost every time I have to work on something on it because it's either impossible to get to or rusted tight. I don't know how they do it... But the car is still going strong now with almost 240k. It doesn't look or sound a mile over 100k.

Well..... your not a mechanic either. Believe me, it doesn't take 3 days to get to the valves on an Intrepid. Maybe 4 hours.

And your wrong about the water pump failure that only leaks coolant into the engine. While I agree it is a poor design, there is a weep hole from the pump to the outside of the motor. What usually happens is some guy who thinks he's a mechanic changes the water pump and puts silicone on the gasket. That plugs up the weep hole, then when the pump fails the coolant can't go out where it's supposed to and ends up in the motor. I have seen it a few times that it was no one's fault.... like somehow dirt got in the weep hole on the block and plugged it up. But usually it's a previous mechanics fault.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:29 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.