Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > IH Cub Cadet Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-22-2014, 03:00 AM
darryljs's Avatar
darryljs darryljs is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Lehighton, PA
Posts: 301
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaner View Post
That may be true...but it may not account for damaged threads or thin threads. I still would not lift a motor like that. I'd much rather lift them by hand or by the head bolts.

Lifting the KT or Magnum motors I use the tabs that are bolted on with the intake manifold bolts. If I can't winch them, I lift them with again...swift back jerking motion lol
I agree, if it has lifting lugs use them, but if it don't its an alternative. If it has damaged threads or thin threads, you should fix that anyway. I posted this idea because I saw a question on how you can lift an engine. I personally lift all small engines by hand. I've been working on engines for 60 yrs and didn't break one yet. I mostly do 1928 to 1950 vintage tractors and cars. I'm not exactly a newbie.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-22-2014, 08:00 AM
ford4150's Avatar
ford4150 ford4150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
Looks like you used 2 on that engine.

How much does it weigh?

It also has a much thicker head......
2 cylinder, 720cc, weighs about 95 lbs.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-22-2014, 09:07 AM
dbuck dbuck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 639
Smile

I too do not think the spark plug hole is a good idea. In my younger days I used to man handle them, but now I am on the 70 mark age wise. I use two eye bolts in the head bolt holes and a chain hoist to pull them and set them back in the tractor. But like they say, to each his own.
__________________
Don B, USAF 1962-1968, Ft. Wayne, IN
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-22-2014, 09:53 AM
Bob95065 Bob95065 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Felton, CA
Posts: 372
Default

I have an I-beam running the width of my garage. I have a chain fall on a trolley up there. I hooked to the lift lug on the head and used the chain fall when I pulled the engines out of my 1450 and 1000. Worked great, no back strain.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-22-2014, 10:33 AM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by darryljs View Post
Just for laughs, I did some calculations (calculated by Engineers Edge and Matbase for shear strength) and it would take over 100,00 lbs to pull out the threads in 242 cast aluminum which is what air cooled heads are made of.
Ahhhhhh...... "engineering" programs. Gotta love 'em.

100,000lbs. huh. I must be a lot stronger than I though, because I've twisted a lot of them out with a short handle rachet before......

You go right ahead and do it that way if you want, but in the words of Jerry Clower..... "I ain't gonna do it!".
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-22-2014, 11:53 AM
jimbob200521's Avatar
jimbob200521 jimbob200521 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sterling, IL
Posts: 3,626
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
Ahhhhhh...... "engineering" programs. Gotta love 'em.

100,000lbs. huh. I must be a lot stronger than I though, because I've twisted a lot of them out with a short handle rachet before......

You go right ahead and do it that way if you want, but in the words of Jerry Clower..... "I ain't gonna do it!".
I'm inclined to agree....
__________________
-Ryan

Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-22-2014, 12:01 PM
yeeter yeeter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 723
Default

A single bolt/screw can hold a lot of inline force. (and 'torquing' bolts creates a large inline tension in the bolt - many times more than what it holds in compression, which is why breaking them by over torquing is so easy - a thread is really a wedge and able to generate very high loads with small torques). Thread friction plays a role, and in some critical applications they measure overall bolt strain deformation and not torque. For thread shear, the bulk of the shear stresses are carried through a small number of threads.

Besides doing pressure vessel design for years, was sitting around drinking beer with some other engineers one day and wondering just how much a drywall screw could hold. So we drove a single drywall screw into the overhead rafters of my buddies shop and it lifted the entire rear end of his pickup.

Side forces, fatigue, and other factors are usually the cause of failures. In this example my fear would be me forgetting to take a bolt out (or something like that). So if Im lifting with a hydraulic lift I end up putting a lot more than the weight of the engine on it.

But really it comes down to other risk factors (in the ideal case it obviously works, but if something that you didnt think of happens to not be ideal then.... could be problems). If someone is willing to take the risk, this method obviously works. Others prefer a different method 'just in case' something goes wrong.

Thanks for posting. I will leave it to each individual to decide for themselves if they want to try it.

If anyone is interested here is a nice writeup on some basic principles: https://www.fastenal.com/content/fed...t%20Design.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-22-2014, 12:08 PM
CADplans's Avatar
CADplans CADplans is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 3,504
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by yeeter View Post

Thanks for posting. I will leave it to each individual to decide for themselves if they want to try it.
Engineers love a discussion like this!!

Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-22-2014, 12:11 PM
yeeter yeeter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: MA
Posts: 723
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CADplans View Post
Engineers love a discussion like this!!

lol Indeed. Mixed with a few beers, all kinds of crazy experimentation can happen....

Come to think of it, does anyone have a junk head and some weights lying around.....???? hmmm.....
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-22-2014, 12:28 PM
TheSaturnV's Avatar
TheSaturnV TheSaturnV is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: OK
Posts: 1,344
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaner View Post
Most of the time I lift by hand with a swift back wrenching motion.

I like it!

I can only add, don't pick it up by grabbing the big spinny-wheel-thing and have some blocks o'wood ready.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.