Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > Implements and Attachments
Reload this Page 1864 cat0
Register FAQ Calendar

Notices

Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-28-2012, 12:49 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default 1864 cat0
I've tried parts lookup but haven't found the part number for the cat0 lift for my 1864. Once I find a part number I should be able to find a manual for it.

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-28-2012, 03:40 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default
Some pics of my current setup. I don't know what is right or wrong so if you see something out of place please let me know. I'm having problems with having enough space to attach the brinly sleeve hitch to cat0 conversion. Unscrewing the two lifting straps (for lack of a better word) gives me just enough room to get the adaptor on but I'm afraid that I have the arms to low now. I've got 1" of threads showing now. (no pic of that yet)

The bracket where the top link attaches was up side down in this pic.
Attachment 23809

Top link bracket is in the correct spot now.
Attachment 23810

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-28-2012, 05:24 AM
CADplans's Avatar
CADplans CADplans is offline
Grand Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 3,503
Default
If you disregard my hitch adapter, it looks like my 1872 arms have lots more "bend" in them!!??



That pic is the arms fully down.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:13 AM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default
His arms are correct...the ones for a super are different.

There's way too much of the treaded portion of the adjusters sticking out the bottom of the arms, for starters.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2012, 08:55 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt G. View Post
His arms are correct...the ones for a super are different.

There's way too much of the treaded portion of the adjusters sticking out the bottom of the arms, for starters.
Thanks Matt. I should have posted this pic last night too. I've got 1 inch of threads showing now. It looks pretty low to the ground but that can be set by the L shaped handle on the left side. I did apply down pressure so see how low it could go so I should try it when it's running to see the normal range.

I know my wife's Uncle Gene never used the cat 0 lift as he told me so. He did buy the 1864 when it was a year old so hard to say if that PO used it or not.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:20 AM
CADplans's Avatar
CADplans CADplans is offline
Grand Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 3,503
Default
Duke, you have multiple mounting holes for the top link, it is possible the top link mounting should be lower!!??

The first photo is too low, the last photo may be too high.

I would try the middle bolt holes and lengthen the top link.

It would look more like my 1872 when I have a regular three point attachment connected that way.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:41 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by CADplans View Post
Duke, you have multiple mounting holes for the top link, it is possible the top link mounting should be lower!!??

The first photo is too low, the last photo may be too high.

I would try the middle bolt holes and lengthen the top link.

It would look more like my 1872 when I have a regular three point attachment connected that way.
I put it there after looking at the Brinly PP-1200 cat 0 manual. The first photo it was mounted upside down.

I wonder how close the 1862 cat 0 hitch is to the 1864 cat 0 hitch. Both tractors are about the same I wonder if the cat 0 hitch is the same. The 1864 parts look up doesn't have a cat 0 hitch listed as an attachment but the 1862 does.

Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-28-2012, 09:58 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
  
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default
I found this manual for the 389 cat 0 hitch. Pages 19-27 for the 389 hitch.

Looks like I've got some reading to do.

http://service.mtdproducts.com/Train...ttachments.pdf
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-28-2012, 01:28 PM
CADplans's Avatar
CADplans CADplans is offline
Grand Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: VA
Posts: 3,503
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Methos View Post
I found this manual for the 389 cat 0 hitch. Pages 19-27 for the 389 hitch.

Looks like I've got some reading to do.

http://service.mtdproducts.com/Train...ttachments.pdf
That is the manual for my 1872 3PT also!!

WOOT!! WOOT!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-28-2012, 07:56 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
  
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default
Try the middle hole in the top link bracket...I've never used the other two for anything.
Reply With Quote
Reply
Page 1 of 2 1 2

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:38 PM.

www.onlycubcadets.net - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.