Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Speciaalties R. F. Houtz and Sons

Patton Acres IH Cub Cadet Parts

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Folks we have a new owner!
Greg Rozar AKA- CubDieselFan


Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > Cub Cadet Engines > Kohler Engines

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-13-2018, 12:50 PM
TheFlyingCub TheFlyingCub is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NH
Posts: 16
Default Anybody use crankshaft balancing?

Hey all-

I've got two engines pulled apart (part of my 105/125 restoration) a K241 and K301 and I had a question.

I assume you guys are familiar with Kirk Engines, anybody use Kirk engine's crankshaft balancing kit? Started looking at it and while the parts are at the machine shop it would make life easy for me to do it now.

I'm just looking for anyone that has it installed or has ran a tractor with it installed to see if it's worth it. Obviously the K series is fine without it, but if it really takes away some of the vibration, that would be nice too. Let me know.
__________________
1968 105
1970 147
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-13-2018, 12:57 PM
olds45512's Avatar
olds45512 olds45512 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Indiana, PA
Posts: 8,290
Default

I've never used that kit or had one balanced but the local guy that turns our cranks can also balance them and he told me his 126 at wot is as smooth as a twin cylinder, I think I'm going to spend the extra money on the next engine and give it a try. I would think having it done by somebody who's knows what they're doing would yeild better results than a one size fits all kit.
__________________
Tim
Pap's 100
Restored 108
1211 Dual Stick
1050
Pap's 100 restoration thread - http://onlycubcadets.net/forum/showthread.php?t=47965
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-13-2018, 01:01 PM
TheFlyingCub TheFlyingCub is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NH
Posts: 16
Default

Nice, thanks olds. I'll see what my shop can do on that end, and I agree with you on that most likely being the better option.
__________________
1968 105
1970 147
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-13-2018, 02:17 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

The K series really wasn't balanced all that well, it is true. While a balanced engine does run smoother, and by all rights should last longer, the K series seems to be pretty durable already. Tim is correct in saying that a individually balanced engine is far bether than a bolt on kit. Yes, you can smooth them up a lot balancing them. That said..... it costs money, and in a standard application it really isn't worth the cost. Now, if you are planning on really speeding the engine up, that's different. Nothing wrong with it, but I'm not going to do it on every engine I overhaul.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-13-2018, 03:27 PM
finsruskw finsruskw is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,984
Default

Mr. Kirk told me as much in an e-mail several years ago, Jon.
I searched and could not find it though or I would post up a copy.

Also, he used to offer the installation service if one was to ship a crank to him but has forgone that as his machinist that did that for him has retired.

Although I am still tempted to have that don on an AQS341 That is bound for the shop this week.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-13-2018, 03:41 PM
olds45512's Avatar
olds45512 olds45512 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Indiana, PA
Posts: 8,290
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
The K series really wasn't balanced all that well, it is true. While a balanced engine does run smoother, and by all rights should last longer, the K series seems to be pretty durable already. Tim is correct in saying that a individually balanced engine is far bether than a bolt on kit. Yes, you can smooth them up a lot balancing them. That said..... it costs money, and in a standard application it really isn't worth the cost. Now, if you are planning on really speeding the engine up, that's different. Nothing wrong with it, but I'm not going to do it on every engine I overhaul.
I wouldn't do it to every engine I build either but if it were a tractor I planned to keep forever and I was going to use it a good bit then the extra cost would be worth it, if it we're just a show tractor it definitely wouldn't be worth it.
__________________
Tim
Pap's 100
Restored 108
1211 Dual Stick
1050
Pap's 100 restoration thread - http://onlycubcadets.net/forum/showthread.php?t=47965
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-13-2018, 03:52 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by olds45512 View Post
I wouldn't do it to every engine I build either but if it were a tractor I planned to keep forever and I was going to use it a good bit then the extra cost would be worth it, if it we're just a show tractor it definitely wouldn't be worth it.
The extra cost would be worth it just so you didn't feel a little shake in your tushy?
A properly rebuilt engine will likely last you and I's lifetime, so is it worth it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-13-2018, 06:32 PM
twoton twoton is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: MA
Posts: 2,532
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheFlyingCub View Post
.....anybody use Kirk engine's crankshaft balancing kit?......
https://www.onlycubcadets.net/forum/...029#post391029
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-13-2018, 08:26 PM
finsruskw finsruskw is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Iowa
Posts: 2,984
Default

This from Mr. Kirk regarding my recent inquiry about his balance plate and whether it would produce a significant difference in an AQS 341.


With his permission...

Difficult to quantify "significant" but everything you can do to counteract the high recip forces in the K341 (due to the heavy piston assembly mass) makes an improvement. I have some customers that state it made a huge improvement, others state that it wasn't worth the expense. The important thing is to use a genuine Kohler piston assembly when you rebuild this engine as the aftermarket equivalent is much too heavy, especially in the thick walled wrist pin. If you use the genuine part, the counterweight plate has a favorable affect on reducing transmitted vibration.

The plate that I sell is the same for the K301, K321 and K341. The variable is the crankshaft counterweight mass and piston mass. The K301 has lighter counterweights, but also the least massive piston. The K321 and K341 use the same crankshaft/counterweights in conjunction with more massive piston assys. Thus the counterweight plate has approximately the same improvement in recip balance factor for all three models.

Hope I didn't confuse the issue?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-13-2018, 08:33 PM
TheFlyingCub TheFlyingCub is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: NH
Posts: 16
Talking

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
The extra cost would be worth it just so you didn't feel a little shake in your tushy?
A properly rebuilt engine will likely last you and I's lifetime, so is it worth it?
Completely agree. Both tractors are roughly 30 years older than me, and they're both still running. They didn't need factory balancing when they were new, and they don't really need it now. But maybe I have a wicked sensitive tush??

But in all seriousness, thanks all. I guess when I get a $# I'll make up my wind if its worth it or not. Getting excited to start throwing pictures up on the 105 restore, she went first.
__________________
1968 105
1970 147
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.