Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Folks we have a new owner!
Greg Rozar AKA- CubDieselFan


Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > CCC/MTD Cub Cadet built Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 05-30-2018, 11:25 AM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorner View Post
Both sides? Same issue?
You've never seen and engine that had stuck piston rings? How about broken ones?
Yes, it could be both. Maybe it got hot and they lost tension.... or broke.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 05-30-2018, 11:36 AM
sorner's Avatar
sorner sorner is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,320
Default

I have, but that was due to rust in the bore. I'm just skeptical that rings became stuck or broken in both sides... But I'm also skeptical of the low compression, when I can see the bore and the piston, and visually the bore looks nice and not all worn out, and there's no scoring at all. All signs point to some issue with the rings, whether stuck, broken, or worn... At this point the only way to know for sure is to pull the pistons out and looking at the rings.
__________________
1912 with Kohler M18 engine repower, CI rear, 50C deck, 364 snow blower
IH Cub Original with deck
#2 cart
GREEN 314 with integral sleeve hitch, H2 and independent brake upgrade from a 317, and front hydraulic blade, 48" deck
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 05-30-2018, 10:43 PM
Oak's Avatar
Oak Oak is offline
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,068
Default

Most people think it's a waste of time but why not do a leak down test? How did the valves and seats look?
__________________
This ain't no hobby....it's an addiction
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 05-30-2018, 10:51 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oak View Post
Most people think it's a waste of time but why not do a leak down test? How did the valves and seats look?
Putting air pressure in the cylinder like he did was a leak down test. Just without the fancy gauge.
If he only heard air through the crank vent, valves are at least trying to hold.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 05-31-2018, 08:04 AM
Oak's Avatar
Oak Oak is offline
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,068
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
Putting air pressure in the cylinder like he did was a leak down test. Just without the fancy gauge.
If he only heard air through the crank vent, valves are at least trying to hold.
Oops, I missed that Jon. I went back and re-read everything...now I'm on the same page.

Keep swinging at it Steve.
__________________
This ain't no hobby....it's an addiction
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 06-05-2018, 10:55 AM
sorner's Avatar
sorner sorner is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,320
Default

I've got the new rings, and new gaskets, and I'm taking the Onan apart and fixing it right.

In other news, I decided to drop in my re-sealed Kohler Magnum M18 engine to see if it would fit, and it bolts right in, and the driveshaft mates up perfectly. So, that engine for a re-power option is definitely a possibility if something goes wrong with the Onan project, but I really want to keep the 1912 original with the Onan engine.
__________________
1912 with Kohler M18 engine repower, CI rear, 50C deck, 364 snow blower
IH Cub Original with deck
#2 cart
GREEN 314 with integral sleeve hitch, H2 and independent brake upgrade from a 317, and front hydraulic blade, 48" deck
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 06-05-2018, 11:02 AM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

If you haven't taken it apart, how do you kow it needs new rings?
How do you know what size rings it needs?
If you don't plan on boring it, you are not "fixing it right", you're just band-aiding it. Just doesn't seem to matter how many times it gets said on here, it's never enough. "Ring jobs" are only temporary.

Also interested to know why Onan and Kohler tractors Show a different part number shaft if they are the same..... I would have bet several dollars the shaft wouldn't fit.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 06-05-2018, 11:17 AM
sorner's Avatar
sorner sorner is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: PA
Posts: 1,320
Default

It is taken apart already. Everything in the bore measures fine. The new standard sized ring gap measures about .12, spec range in the manual is .10-.20. Maybe rings won't fix it (I hope they will), but you're the one who suggested the rings were the low compression issue, cracked or lost tension. They weren't cracked or broken, so I have to go with they lost tension somehow. The bore is not scored or visibly worn. I have seen worn bores with a ridge at the top and the bottom and everywhere in between is smooth as glass, this has no ridge and still has visible crosshatch in both sides. I've never once claimed to be an expert at this, but I'm not an idiot. It's not like I'm just trying to re-ring an engine that has a severely worn bore.

If everything checks out and it's just bad rings for whatever reason, why does it need bored? I do not understand that statement.
__________________
1912 with Kohler M18 engine repower, CI rear, 50C deck, 364 snow blower
IH Cub Original with deck
#2 cart
GREEN 314 with integral sleeve hitch, H2 and independent brake upgrade from a 317, and front hydraulic blade, 48" deck
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 06-05-2018, 11:31 AM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorner View Post
It is taken apart already. Everything in the bore measures fine. The new standard sized ring gap measures about .12, spec range in the manual is .10-.20. Maybe rings won't fix it (I hope they will), but you're the one who suggested the rings were the low compression issue, cracked or lost tension. They weren't cracked or broken, so I have to go with they lost tension somehow. The bore is not scored or visibly worn. I have seen worn bores with a ridge at the top and the bottom and everywhere in between is smooth as glass, this has no ridge and still has visible crosshatch in both sides. I've never once claimed to be an expert at this, but I'm not an idiot. It's not like I'm just trying to re-ring an engine that has a severely worn bore.

If everything checks out and it's just bad rings for whatever reason, why does it need bored? I do not understand that statement.
It's not often that a bore is good and rings will fix it. If the end gap is good, the bore is good, and none of the rings are broken.... then maybe it isn't a cylinder issue. It is possible the rings have gotten hot and lost tension.... but that usually results in a scored piston, blue sections on the bore or piston erosion and a burnt valve. There should be an obvious issue. Perhaps someone already took it apart and honed and rerung it and that is the issue. I can't see this engine, and you haven't posted any pics..... nor can I measure the parts. Relying on you here.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 06-05-2018, 11:55 AM
DeltaCub's Avatar
DeltaCub DeltaCub is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sorner View Post
It is taken apart already. Everything in the bore measures fine. The new standard sized ring gap measures about .12, spec range in the manual is .10-.20. Maybe rings won't fix it (I hope they will), but you're the one who suggested the rings were the low compression issue, cracked or lost tension. They weren't cracked or broken, so I have to go with they lost tension somehow. The bore is not scored or visibly worn. I have seen worn bores with a ridge at the top and the bottom and everywhere in between is smooth as glass, this has no ridge and still has visible crosshatch in both sides. I've never once claimed to be an expert at this, but I'm not an idiot. It's not like I'm just trying to re-ring an engine that has a severely worn bore.

If everything checks out and it's just bad rings for whatever reason, why does it need bored? I do not understand that statement.

Not boring a cylinder block for a rebuild is like building a foundation for your home without the proper footings! You can build the wall but it is not right and it will result in costly problems til the initial problem is addressed.
Now about your engine, the bore may be sort of round, but it is not correct. Cylinders need to be trued, they need to have the glaze removed and proper crosshatching for the rings to "seat". It may have some crosshatch and no ridge but it needs boring if you are going to rebuild it properly.

Rebuilding engines can be costly. But it is cheaper in the long run to spend the money up front so you won't have the same problems and additional expenses later.
__________________


Queen Of The Quietlines!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.