Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > IH Cub Cadet Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #531  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:54 PM
westofb's Avatar
westofb westofb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 533
Default

I still stand by my confirmed statement, I agree with Matt that you could be a tooth off in either direction and still get them to open as the s mark moved into the window. However, if you cam was in wrong, one tooth off, you would have one of two senarios. One tooth off in one direction would have the points rod riding on the baseline of the cam load, to get it to break in this senario, your points would constantly be open, since you are on the baseline of the lobe, they would have no choice but to be open. The second senario is that when you set them to open as the s mark moved into the window, you would already be up on the lobe of the cam (they are already starting to open before reaching the s mark), this might be hard to tell, but as the cam follower dropped back down on to the base line of the cam, you would have slack between the follower and points themselves. So if you were off in this senario, it would be hard to see slack in the follower/ points, so maybe you could be off in one direction, but I would think you could detect the slack between the follower and points if you were to look closely (may have to use a magnifying glass).

So Matt could be right if you off one tooth in the second senario, just for the fact that detecting the slack between the follower and points would be tough. In the first senario, you would never get the points to close because you set them to open on the cam lobes baseline or base circle. I hope this makes sense.
__________________
Jeff
Brookfield, MO
________________
IH Red 782 with weights and sleeve hitch!
IH snow blade, Brinly plow, Brinly disk, Brinly harrow, Johnson rear blade, and a #2 IH Cart
Reply With Quote
  #532  
Old 11-04-2011, 05:54 PM
CC1650Dave's Avatar
CC1650Dave CC1650Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 586
Default

It's funny I'm second-guessing myself on the cam/crank matching. I'm sure I got it right but this whole mess just picks at your brain.
Reply With Quote
  #533  
Old 11-04-2011, 06:24 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofb View Post
One tooth off in one direction would have the points rod riding on the baseline of the cam load, to get it to break in this senario, your points would constantly be open, since you are on the baseline of the lobe, they would have no choice but to be open.
It sounds like you are saying the points would always be open. They won't...they'll be off the same 5ish degrees the cam is off, but they will still open and close normally. There is so much adjustment range available in the points that you could still set them to break when the "S" mark is in the sight hole.

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofb View Post
The second senario is that when you set them to open as the s mark moved into the window, you would already be up on the lobe of the cam (they are already starting to open before reaching the s mark), this might be hard to tell, but as the cam follower dropped back down on to the base line of the cam, you would have slack between the follower and points themselves. So if you were off in this senario, it would be hard to see slack in the follower/ points, so maybe you could be off in one direction, but I would think you could detect the slack between the follower and points if you were to look closely (may have to use a magnifying glass).
There cannot be 'slack' between the points, rod, and cam under any circumstances. The spring in the points keeps the pushrod in contact with the points and cam. If it was floating, you wouldn't be able to run the engine, let alone time it.

Heck, take the crank out, and the cam, pushrod, and points will still operate the same way...
Reply With Quote
  #534  
Old 11-04-2011, 06:28 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1650Dave View Post
Yeah, the plug is new and properly gapped. I can't remember the brand I'm using, but it's the one that everyone here likes. Maybe it was an Autolite 216, or 261? Something like that.

Regarding this fuel test you do, what kind of ratio are you mixing this fuel? That's the main thing that has made me hold off on it.

The plug wire, condenser and ignition switch are next. After that, I'll swap the coil and see. Beyond that, the only thing I could do is replace the points (they're new aftermarket, came with the kit) with some Kohler points.
Mix it to whatever 2-cycle ratio you like. 40:1, 50:1, etc. Just use some of the mixed fuel from your chainsaw or week whacker. It may not even be all that critical, but this is how my dad has always done it, and neither of us has lost an engine as a result. Any amount of 2-cycle oil mixed in there is going to be better than raw gas, at any rate.

Before you start troubleshooting electrical components, simply visually check for strong blue spark at the plug. If you have that, the coil, condenser, wire, plug, etc are all fine and you have some other problem.
Reply With Quote
  #535  
Old 11-04-2011, 06:59 PM
pulse301 pulse301 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Georgia
Posts: 87
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt G. View Post
Before you start troubleshooting electrical components, simply visually check for strong blue spark at the plug. If you have that, the coil, condenser, wire, plug, etc are all fine and you have some other problem.
Not trying to play devils advocate, but just want to share an experience I had with my case 222. It has the same engine and ignition switch as the 1250. I was having problems getting the tractor to start, the engine would shake pretty rough, sometimes it would actually start, but would shake rough and finally die. When I pulled the plug to see if it had spark, it actually did, and it was a strong blue like Matt describes. BUT, when I'd put the plug back in, the engine would get flooded or run extremely rough if it did fire, and die. It turned out, one of the wire connecting to the ignition switch was pretty dirty and EXTREMELY loose. What was interesting, when I would take the spark plug out, the spark was perfect, because the air in the engine could escape the plug hole, and not shake the tractor. But when i would put the plug back in, the engine was shaking enough to make the wire wiggle, and would short out against the wire next to it. I only noticed it when I tried firing it up in the dark one night, and a spark caught my eye coming from behind the ignition switch. In all honesty, you're probably safe if you have the blue spark, but I know from experience now that the blue spark doesn't guarantee no electrical problems, haha.
__________________
- Dusty

http://ihcc123.blogspot.com
Reply With Quote
  #536  
Old 11-05-2011, 03:55 AM
westofb's Avatar
westofb westofb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 533
Default

If the points will always close and put tension on the cam follower, then how would they ever open to start with? When you are setting the points, you are setting the base of the points as the stopping point, as the follower comes up on the lobe it is pushing the spring loaded part of the points away from the fixed base. But I guess I am missing something, your the cub/ kohler guru around here, I guess I have no idea what I am talking about.
__________________
Jeff
Brookfield, MO
________________
IH Red 782 with weights and sleeve hitch!
IH snow blade, Brinly plow, Brinly disk, Brinly harrow, Johnson rear blade, and a #2 IH Cart
Reply With Quote
  #537  
Old 11-05-2011, 08:46 AM
Sugarmaker's Avatar
Sugarmaker Sugarmaker is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Albion PA
Posts: 1,857
Default

Dave,
Watching from over here in NW PA. We are here for you!
Regards,
Chris
__________________
Casbohm Maple and Honey
www.mapleandhoney.com

Cubs: 147R and the "train", 127 elec lift, 127, 125, 106, 102, 100, 86, 73, Brinly plow, Snow thrower, 2 Rototillers, several mower decks and several snow plows, #1 cart, Grandkids barrel cart.
Reply With Quote
  #538  
Old 11-05-2011, 09:12 AM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofb View Post
When you are setting the points, you are setting the base of the points as the stopping point, as the follower comes up on the lobe it is pushing the spring loaded part of the points away from the fixed base.
Now that's correct...I think I misinterpreted your previous post, and then wasn't seeing it quite correctly in my mind. Yes, once the points are closed the pushrod is floating in there. But still, it wouldn't matter, as that situation still exists whether you have the cam properly timed to the crank, or off a tooth. The points lobe is an eccentric circle, which I think results in more uniform motion of the points plunger (the lobe for the fuel pump is the same way, probably for the same reason) and like I said before, there is so much adjustment range that it won't matter. You can set the points to be open all the time, closed all the time, and anything in between. All you are doing by changing the fixed point is adjusting the angle the cam is at when the points open, so as a result you could compensate for the cam being off a couple teeth and therefore not be able to ascertain whether or not the crank/cam are timed to each other correctly.

I think we are beating a dead horse at this point anyway, since I thought Dave posted pictures of his correctly-aligned timing marks. Or am I thinking of someone else?
Reply With Quote
  #539  
Old 11-05-2011, 09:42 AM
Methos Methos is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 10,941
Default

Wouldn't pulling the head and bringing it to TDC and checking the site hole and seeing T stamp mean that the cam and crank are timed correctly?
Reply With Quote
  #540  
Old 11-05-2011, 09:53 AM
Oak's Avatar
Oak Oak is offline
Senior Moderator
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 5,294
Default

Dave, if you pull the fuel line off the carb do you get good flow from the tank? Maybe jump 12 volts to the coil to to bypass any problems in the ignition circuit like Pulse said. Try another Autilite 216 plug. WTF this thing should run.
__________________
This ain't no hobby....it's an addiction
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.