Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

P&K Cub Cadet Machtech Direct

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Guest, We have turned off the forum to guest. This is due to bots attacking the site. It is still free to register.

-->
Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Cub Cadets > IH Cub Cadet Tractors (GT)

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 07-20-2011, 09:39 PM
_DX3_'s Avatar
_DX3_ _DX3_ is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Richmond, Kentucky
Posts: 5,798
Default

It's nothing to lose sleep over... An 8.50 wide tire fits a 7 inch rim. A 10.50 tire normally goes onto a 7.5 inch rim. The 10.50 tire will fit the 7 inch rim ok, it will just simply pull the tread in on the sides some. I mounted the wide tire on a 7 inch rim with no issues. Some guys in here have mounted the 8.50 tire onto the narrow 6 inch rim and they look awesome on the older cubs. Don't over think it too much. And yes, they are 23 inches tall. The rim is 12 inches from top to bottom.
__________________
DWayne

1973: 128, ag tires, 3pt. lift, spring assist, lights, 42" Deck

10" moldboard plow

2016 XT1 42" deck 18HP
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 07-20-2011, 10:02 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

A 10.50 tire came on an 8.5" rim on a CC, as did the 26-12-12s, although with a different offset.

Regardless of how 'cool' it looks mounted on the wrong rim, the tire will work better if it is mounted on the size of rim it is designed for.
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 07-20-2011, 10:39 PM
_DX3_'s Avatar
_DX3_ _DX3_ is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Richmond, Kentucky
Posts: 5,798
Default

Yep I had 7 inch on my mind all thru that, LOL.

I'm still trying to figure out the issue of whether a tire works good or not depending on the rim and certain brands, etc. I have plowed, mowed, worked with tires on rims as I mentioned, with wider tires on a narrower rim and also on correct width rims. I think unless your are pulling competition or doing some serious 12 inch moldboard plowing in hard packed ground, the wider tires all work great no matter if on a smaller rim or on a "correct" rim. Ags will grab and will pull, turf tires will, well do what turf tires do also. The only good differences I have seen is the advantage of fluid filled tires or wheels with weights to enhance pulling and grip. For 99% of the people out there, doing the average home and yard work it won't matter much of which wheel they will use. The tire on the other hand makes a huge difference. As most have seen, Ags for most of the year and then changing over to turfs with chains seems to do the best with snow removal. Granted I know nothing of snow removal, we have little to no snow removal in this section of the country. Just my 2 cents from real life experience. Of course we all know about opinions .
__________________
DWayne

1973: 128, ag tires, 3pt. lift, spring assist, lights, 42" Deck

10" moldboard plow

2016 XT1 42" deck 18HP
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 07-20-2011, 11:00 PM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

The reason I say that is because if you put a tire on a rim that's narrower than what is supposed to be used, or inflate the tire too much on the correct rim, it balloons out and less of the tread is contacting the ground. Ideally the tread profile should all be touching the ground.

Will you notice any difference? I don't know...I just try to do the best I can with what I have. My 35-year-old tires will have the best chance of working properly when they're mounted on the correct rims and properly inflated. Things are usually the way they are for a reason. I used to have a rather large PDF file of a document from Goodyear that explained more than you ever wanted to know about tires, including this subject, and what tread patterns work best for different soils. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find it in awhile. I think I lost it during a hard drive swap a couple years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 07-21-2011, 02:52 AM
CC1650Dave's Avatar
CC1650Dave CC1650Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt G. View Post
A 10.50 tire came on an 8.5" rim on a CC, as did the 26-12-12s, although with a different offset.
.
OK, that helps. Thanks guys. However Matt, in your statement quoted here, you're talking about 8.5" rim width, right? And nothing on the tire will tell me anything about rim width.

I now remember doing the rim width thing while putting big tires on a Ram 3500 4x4 I owned.

The only way I'm going to be able to determine my rim width is to measure it with a tire off, I guess.

I want to be able to determine how much tire width I can put on the tractor within the confines of my current rims, and the confines of the fenders / hubs overall. I know offsets factor in here as well.

Fat is good.

BTW, I'm kind of thinking about going toward industrial tires like those found on the Yanmar Cubs, rather than Ag tires.
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 07-21-2011, 03:42 AM
CC1650Dave's Avatar
CC1650Dave CC1650Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 586
Default De-Rusting parts

Check this out:

I was talking to a neighbor about my project last week, and I told him that I was planning on building an electrolytic cleaner to de-rust parts.

He works in a manufacturing company.

When I told him that if all goes well, I may upscale my electrolytic system to a 55 gallon drum, he told me he could get me one for free. Cool, a free plastic drum.

Then he told me that they had 10 gallons of this industrial de-ruster at the shop that they weren't using - and I could have it, free. I said I'd try it. From what I understand, it's a citrus-based product, the MSDS numbers on it are very low (as in, safe to near Windex numbers) so I wanted to give it a try.

So before I build my electrolytic cleaner, I tested this stuff in a 5 gallon pail. He told me it was 4 parts water, 1 part solution and a 24 hour soak.

I grabbed up a few parts for a trial run. I wound up soaking for 36 hours because I forgot about it until this evening. Here are some before and after pics:

A few hangers from the mower deck:

.
Before:



.
After soak:



.

And a very easy wire-wheeling:

.



.

The footrest plates didn't dip all the way in, which provides a nice contrast of before and after:

.

Before:

.



.

After rinsing and toweling it off, most of the paint came off:
.



.

And again, some very easy work with the 3/8 drill using a flap disc sander and a wire wheel for the tight spots. The rust line is the dip line:

.



.

I think I like this stuff!

I'd still like to build the electrolytic cleaner to compare results, but from what I've seen in pictures and video, this stuff is equal to - if not better than - the results guys are getting with electrolytic.

I'll give you some details on the product later - although, I'm pretty sure you can't buy it unless you're an industrial company, because I couldn't even get info on the chemistry and directions on the web...
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 07-21-2011, 08:49 AM
Matt G.'s Avatar
Matt G. Matt G. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Wichita, KS
Posts: 5,661
Default

Yes, I was referring to rim width.

Electrolysis is a great way to clean parts. You can get good results with washing soda, as well. The paint will fall off and what remains can usually be wire-wheeled off easily.
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:15 AM
CC1650Dave's Avatar
CC1650Dave CC1650Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 586
Default

You're talking about using washing soda with electrolysis, right?

I bought lye for the electrolytic cleaner. A friend of mine is a chemist, and told me that he thought trisodium phosphate would work even better, as it would anodize the parts after de-rusting them.

After shopping for TSP, I learned that Michigan was one of 17 states that banned its sale. But fortunately, I can get a 4.5 lb box of it online for about $20 with shipping.

I'm going to put an order out for it. This stuff is also excellent to add to your dishwasher and clothes washer, about a teaspoon added will really improve your results from what I've heard.
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:39 AM
westofb's Avatar
westofb westofb is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Missouri
Posts: 533
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CC1650Dave View Post
Rear end stuff:

I'm thinking I may want to go ahead and pull the axles, replacing the seals, checking the needle bearings, and replacing the gaskets there. Seems like these would be obvious leakers after all these years, no?
While you got it apart, I would change them. I have recently changed the axle seals in my project 149 and 129. Both tractors had each had one seal that were obviously bad (you could see where it had slung fluid on the back side of the wheel/ brake rotor). After pulling the axles, all the seals had been leaking, the ones that weren't obviously leaking were still leaking.

For your info, I got my axle seals at O'Reilly's for $4.00 each....the were National Seals part number 471224, you should be able to cross reference this number at any auto parts store, I think the ones from Cub Cadet dealer were $6.00+ each.
__________________
Jeff
Brookfield, MO
________________
IH Red 782 with weights and sleeve hitch!
IH snow blade, Brinly plow, Brinly disk, Brinly harrow, Johnson rear blade, and a #2 IH Cart
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 07-21-2011, 11:48 AM
CC1650Dave's Avatar
CC1650Dave CC1650Dave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: MI
Posts: 586
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by westofb View Post
For your info, I got my axle seals at O'Reilly's for $4.00 each....the were National Seals part number 471224
Cool, I'll go pick up a set. The inside of the wheels is relatively dry, but the axle hubs are greasy, so it's either the seals or the gaskets I figure.

Are those needle bearings going to want to fall apart when I take them out, or are they held into the assembly? I hate dealing with bearings that fall apart when you move them.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.