Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Folks we have a new owner!
Greg Rozar AKA- CubDieselFan


Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Off Topic > General Talk

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-18-2016, 08:51 PM
Guitar Guy Guitar Guy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: WV
Posts: 189
Default Pickup Truck advice, Dodge vs. Chevy

Hey all. I've been driving S-10 style trucks for a few yrs now, and am getting ready to sell my little GMC Sonoma and get a full size 1/2 ton, 4x4, extended cab. For various reasons, I'm not into Fords, but cannot make up my mind between the Dodge and the Chevy / GMC.

Maybe some of you guys who know both will feel like giving me a few positives and negatives. I'll add here a little about what I'll be using it for.

I'll mostly be using it as a second vehicle for camping, going on vacations, etc. If I do any pulling, it would be a small motorcycle trailer. Occasional 4wd, not hard mudding. I'd consider a 3/4 ton, but mainly prefer 1/2 ton. I'd like to get a small to medium V8, definitely not the large V8. I'll be looking at something between years 2000 - 2006, in the $10 - 12k range.

The things that I'm wondering about, and that are important to me ... do either of the brands mentioned have less of a tendency to get body rust when exposed to winter weather and salt? Does either of them have a particular engine which is known to have better reliability and/or fuel economy? I've mostly had GM products in my lifetime, but I did have a '78 Dodge half ton with a 318, and it was a great truck. I like the newer Dodge, but it seems I see more of them rusted on the road.

I'm just starting to do the research, so I thought I'd throw it out here ... any info / suggestions regarding Dodge vs. Chevy would be greatly appreciated.

JT
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-18-2016, 09:18 PM
olds45512's Avatar
olds45512 olds45512 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Indiana, PA
Posts: 8,290
Default

As far a rust is concerned, Dodge is the absolute worst of all the brands. For every rusty Chevy I fix, I probably fix 10 rusty Dodges. Dodge likes to fill every open cavity with foam which doesn't do anything other that hold moisture and speed up the rusting process.

The 5.3L in the Chevys runs good with plenty of power to tow and they get good gas mileage. I get 19 mpg empty and 13mpg pulling an 18ft trailer with 5 cubs on it.
__________________
Tim
Pap's 100
Restored 108
1211 Dual Stick
1050
Pap's 100 restoration thread - http://onlycubcadets.net/forum/showthread.php?t=47965
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-18-2016, 09:21 PM
Jeff in Pa's Avatar
Jeff in Pa Jeff in Pa is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Zionsville, PA
Posts: 3,171
Default

I have a '01 Suburban with the 6.0L and it's a 2500 ( 3/4 ton )

I have over 195K on it and it still runs great. Vote for another GM here.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-18-2016, 10:17 PM
cub123's Avatar
cub123 cub123 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: VA
Posts: 1,545
Default

I have a newer Ram 2500 with a cummins and manual transmission and love it, but to be honest, as far as an older 1/2 ton for what you want it for I would have to say a chevy too. They seem like nice trucks, my only issue is the plastic door/ tailgate handles seem to break easy.
__________________
149 with kwik-way loader,1772,two 1782 super smokers, 982 SGT w 54" haban blade,60" haban deck, 50in deck cat 0 3 point, brinly cat 0: blade, plow(3), disc.123,hydro lift. 61"O" Brinly single row planter,brinly cultivator,#2 trailer,brinly 10 inch plow,3 42 inch blades,Model #1 Tiller with extenstions,haban sickle mo. 106w/ags and hydro lift.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-18-2016, 10:49 PM
OneBadBinder OneBadBinder is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: VA
Posts: 32
Default

I am not a Chevy fan but after owning a Dodge Ram 2500 with the 360 Auto I would say the Chevy is your better option. My truck rusted out bad in the rear wheel wells and the rocker panels were completely trashed. I didn't baby the truck but it did get washed regularly.
__________________
-Wes

'67 125 48" Deck, 1A Tiller, 36" Snow Thrower, Push blade

'03 2166 42" Deck
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-18-2016, 11:14 PM
bocephus1991's Avatar
bocephus1991 bocephus1991 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 2,633
Default

I'm neither so have fun guys!
__________________
Brian

April 1979 1200 Quietline 44A deck 1988 1211 customized into a 1288 with a K301AQS 38C deck and a 1864 54” deck . Snow blades 42" and 54" . Brinly disk, brinly plow a cultivator and a $5 brinly yard rake!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-18-2016, 11:15 PM
SS5150's Avatar
SS5150 SS5150 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Spring Grove, Illinois
Posts: 477
Default

Chev's of that vintage rust bad too, I had an '04 Sierra extended cab z71 with a 5.3l that I bought new, it was an excellent truck but rockers rusted out bad on me. Mine had fender flares so I don't know if the wheel wells were trashed underneath or not. It was a good truck. I've stayed with GM trucks since (a '12 and now a '15). I am a technician at a Chrysler/Jeep/Dodge/Ram dealer.

The vintage trucks you're talking about I would go GM no question and the 5.3 is going to be your best bet as far as the engine. The trucks got a facelift and interior upgrade in '03 along with some nicer wheel options, and I think satellite radio came on in '04, '05 went to rear drum brakes (from discs) , and I think in '05 1/2 they dropped the vortecmax trucks with the 6.0L in the 1/2 ton although they are hard to find.
__________________
RUN IN THE RED
782 w/50c deck (red); 782 dual stick, 44c deck (y/w);
1050 w/38c deck; 1864 w/54" GT deck;
1872 project
Cub Cadet Pro Z 560 L
42" power angle snowblade, #2 tiller, 2-QA42a snowthrowers, 450 thrower, #2 cart; 54" Haban blade; Brinly box blade, 48" dethatcher, moldboard plow; Agri-Fab sweeper
1200, 1863, 1864 parts machines
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-18-2016, 11:45 PM
cubby102's Avatar
cubby102 cubby102 is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Kewanee, Illinois
Posts: 1,969
Default

Personaly I prefure the chevy. I've owned both for a few years each. Gas milage in the chevy was definatly better. But it did seem like the dodge had more grunt to tow. Chevy rode better and just felt a little more sturdy... if I were to get another truck that were newer itd definatly be another chevy with the 5.3
__________________
1872 - 60"haban 54" power angle haban blade
'63 Original - restoration project
582 -tiller
147 - leaf duty with bagger.
1811 - Ditch mower
800 - have it just cuz its a 800
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-19-2016, 12:19 AM
jaynjeep's Avatar
jaynjeep jaynjeep is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Statesboro, GA
Posts: 2,143
Default

I hate to go here... but I have to...

The Dodge mechanicals are great but the bodies are not that great... They are a lot better than they were in the 70's and 80's.. They also like a lot of gasoline..

The Chevys are good if you mostly ride and use it for occasional heavy work.. Good ride and drive and good fuel economy

If you want to work it hard and have it stay together... get a Ford...

Look at what all the rollback, wrecker and power companies use... 80 percent Ford around here...

We have owned and run Fords for 3 generations.... My dad used to maintain a fleet of trucks for a large farm supply dealer... everything from a 1/2 ton to a 3 ton.. Quite a few have over 300K hard work miles on them... Never had a bad one...

Just my opinion... don't hate me
__________________
Jay

40 years of Using and playing with IH Cub Cadets!

Proud owner of the following:
Cub Farmall, Super A Farmall, Original, (2)70's, 72, 100, 102, 123, 105, 125, 127, 108, 128, 1450, (3)782's, Yellow 982, 1782, "Sam's" 2182, M Farmall and a #7 trailer
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-19-2016, 07:21 AM
Sam Mac's Avatar
Sam Mac Sam Mac is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Galax VA
Posts: 18,754
Default

Last Dodge I owned was a Dakota, worst POS I've ever owned. Chevy's not a lot better. I'm now driving a Toyota Tacoma now, it runs like a clock. Plenty of power and good on gas.
__________________
2264 with 54 GT deck
1641 AKA Black Jack with a 402-E Haban Sickle bar mower
JD317 dump truck
BX2670 with FEL
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.