Only Cub Cadets

PLEASE PATRONIZE OUR SPONSORS!

CC Specialties R. F. Houtz and Sons Jeff in Pa.

Cub Cadet Parts & Service


If you would like to help maintain this site & enhance it, feel free to donate whatever amount you would like to!




Attention Folks we have a new owner!
Greg Rozar AKA- CubDieselFan


Go Back   Only Cub Cadets > Off Topic > General Talk

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-03-2015, 12:34 PM
j4c11's Avatar
j4c11 j4c11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 769
Default Gaskets

I am going to purchase a sheet of neoprene rubber for gaskets from McMaster for a non-cub application, but I got to thinking, why isn't rubber used more for gaskets? Seems like a neoprene rear end gasket for example could be used over and over again rather than having to buy a new every time. Is there a technical reason for not using rubber or is it simply a matter of material cost?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-03-2015, 12:54 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Rubber is used for lots of gaskets. The company Fel-Pro makes all types of "rubber" gaskets. Their Perma-dry Plus line is all basically rubber. Why doesn't CCC offer more rubber gaskets...... cost.

I like your idea.... but I'm really interested in how you plan to cut it and add holes in an effective manner. Rubber is hard to work with without a die to stamp it because it stretches so much when you try and cut it with a knife. I've not tried any of those sheets, though so it may be easier than I think. I'm also interested which product your chose, as McMaster sells more than one neoprene rubber gasket material.

Not to derail, just as a side note: I think most guys get all too hung up on the rear cover gasket. Silicone alone holds just fine. I don't have any issues with any gaskets on the cubs leaking once they have been fixed. I honestly don't understand why so many people change out a gasket just to have it still leak.

Please keep us up on how this works out!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-03-2015, 01:13 PM
j4c11's Avatar
j4c11 j4c11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 769
Default

I bought the reinforced neoprene sheet (8525T55) for extra strength, and I think the nylon mesh may reduce/limit the stretching. I definitely can't cut the rear gasket by hand, you're right the holes would be hard to do. But I'm going to do the valve cover gasket for the K321 with an exacto knife and see how it works out .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-03-2015, 01:16 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

I just thought of something else I didn't mention. Most all of the rubber gaskets that are made for applications have some properties that make them work best.

Lets use a valve cover gasket on a GM 3100 V6 engine.
The gasket on this application is all rubber. It fits into a groove machined in the valve cover so that when the cover is tightened down, the rubber cannot "squeeze" out the side. The groove makes the rubber hold it's shape, and therefore, do it's job. On the same engine, the intake manifold gasket (I'm using a Fel-Pro Permadry Plus for this example) is attached to an aluminum backing plate. There is rubber attached to both sides, and is not all that thick. When the intake is torqued down (not a very high torque) the aluminum plate again, hold the rubber in place. The fact that is glued to the aluminum makes it retain it's shape and not just "squeeze" out of place. There are countless other gaskets on lots of different applications that are made with this metal center plate.

I guess my point here is that a single piece of rubber used as a gasket for the rear cover, I fear, will just displace and squeeze out when you go to torque it. I think you will find that you won't be able to get the bolts tight enough without the gasket moving out of place. A paper gasket (such as the OEM one) will withstand the torque process and not displace when it is tightened as that material's "crush" strength allows it to retain it's shape. I'm not sure it will work at all...... but it may surprise me!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-03-2015, 01:22 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by j4c11 View Post
I bought the reinforced neoprene sheet (8525T55) for extra strength, and I think the nylon mesh may reduce/limit the stretching. I definitely can't cut the rear gasket by hand, you're right the holes would be hard to do. But I'm going to do the valve cover gasket for the K321 with an exacto knife and see how it works out .

That gasket is not rated for oil. Only detergents.

The Viton material would be a better choice, as it's an oil resistant material. Lots of oil seals are made of Viton.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-03-2015, 01:34 PM
j4c11's Avatar
j4c11 j4c11 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 769
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
That gasket is not rated for oil. Only detergents.

The Viton material would be a better choice, as it's an oil resistant material. Lots of oil seals are made of Viton.
I agree, but it's 4x the price, $31.89 vs $7.89, so I skipped right over it
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-03-2015, 01:40 PM
J-Mech J-Mech is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Oblong, Illinois
Posts: 17,594
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by j4c11 View Post
I agree, but it's 4x the price, $31.89 vs $7.89, so I skipped right over it
That's why the OEM gasket is probably the best choice, and why they don't offer one made of rubber...... because of the price. I don't think the one you chose will stand up very long to oil. More than likely it will swell and leak in a short time period. I'll just keep siliconing my rear covers, and using the paper valve cover gaskets. Cheaper.

I'm sure that's not what you wanted to hear..... sorry.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2015, 02:00 PM
sbauerz28's Avatar
sbauerz28 sbauerz28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Owego NY
Posts: 355
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by J-Mech View Post
I just thought of something else I didn't mention. Most all of the rubber gaskets that are made for applications have some properties that make them work best.

Lets use a valve cover gasket on a GM 3100 V6 engine.
The gasket on this application is all rubber. It fits into a groove machined in the valve cover so that when the cover is tightened down, the rubber cannot "squeeze" out the side. The groove makes the rubber hold it's shape, and therefore, do it's job. On the same engine, the intake manifold gasket (I'm using a Fel-Pro Permadry Plus for this example) is attached to an aluminum backing plate. There is rubber attached to both sides, and is not all that thick. When the intake is torqued down (not a very high torque) the aluminum plate again, hold the rubber in place. The fact that is glued to the aluminum makes it retain it's shape and not just "squeeze" out of place. There are countless other gaskets on lots of different applications that are made with this metal center plate.

I guess my point here is that a single piece of rubber used as a gasket for the rear cover, I fear, will just displace and squeeze out when you go to torque it. I think you will find that you won't be able to get the bolts tight enough without the gasket moving out of place. A paper gasket (such as the OEM one) will withstand the torque process and not displace when it is tightened as that material's "crush" strength allows it to retain it's shape. I'm not sure it will work at all...... but it may surprise me!
I've done so many head gaskets and intake gaskets on those and the 3400 engines I think I could do it with my eyes closed.

They sure have come along way with gaskets in general, but for the purpose of a Cub rear cover I bet a can of "Right Stuff" would seal better than any gasket.
__________________
1450 w/ 44gt deck, 1572 w/ 50C deck, 450 snowblower.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2015, 02:04 PM
Shrewcub's Avatar
Shrewcub Shrewcub is offline
Grand Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Nokesville, VA
Posts: 2,032
Default

I am curious to how this works out too.

In my experience on rear end covers using RTV, is that once it fully cures, you could probably take the bolts out and it would never leak. On Cubs you still need the bottom ones for the drawbar tho.
__________________
Travis

1993 Cub Cadet 2064
1988 Cub Cadet 2072
1980 IH Cub Cadet 782 w/CH20
1966 IH Cub Cadet 102 w/K301
1961 IH Cub Cadet O
1967 IH Cub Cadet 102 & 122

JD 2155 w/ 175 loader
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2015, 03:19 PM
Calvins66Cub's Avatar
Calvins66Cub Calvins66Cub is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 392
Default

I just made some gaskets from this McMaster # 9470K37
Is was pretty easy to work with, and no leaks.
I did use some silicone also.
__________________
1966__122 Cub Cadet.
Owner: Calvin, 6 yrs old
Dad: Craig
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.

Cub Cadet is a premium line of outdoor power equipment, established in 1961 as part of International Harvester. During the 1960s, IH initiated an entirely new line of lawn and garden equipment aimed at the owners rural homes with large yards and private gardens. There were a wide variety of Cub Cadet branded and after-market attachments available; including mowers, blades, snow blowers, front loaders, plows, carts, etc. Cub Cadet advertising at that time harped on their thorough testing by "boys - acknowledged by many as the world's worst destructive force!". Cub Cadets became known for their dependability and rugged construction.

MTD Products, Inc. of Cleveland, Ohio purchased the Cub Cadet brand from International Harvester in 1981. Cub Cadet was held as a wholly owned subsidiary for many years following this acquisition, which allowed them to operate independently. Recently, MTD has taken a more aggressive role and integrated Cub Cadet into its other lines of power equipment.

This website and forum are not affiliated with or sponsored by MTD Products Inc, which owns the CUB CADET trademarks. It is not an official MTD Products Inc, website, and MTD Products Inc, is not responsible for any of its content. The official MTD Products Inc, website can be found at: http://www.mtdproducts.com. The information and opinions expressed on this website are the responsibility of the website's owner and/or it's members, and do not represent the opinions of MTD Products Inc. IH, INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER are registered trademark of CNH America LLC

All material, images, and graphics from this site are the property of www.onlycubcadets.net. Any unauthorized use, reproductions, or duplications are prohibited unless solely expressed in writing.

Cub Cadet, Cub, Cadet, IH, MTD, Parts, Tractors, Tractor, International Harvester, Lawn, Garden, Lawn Mower, Kohler, garden tractor equipment, lawn garden tractors, antique garden tractors, garden tractor, PTO, parts, online, Original, 70, 71, 72, 73, 76, SO76, 80, 81, 86, 100, 102, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108,109, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 147, 149, 169, 182, 282, 382, 482, 580, 582, 582 Special, 680, 682, 782, 782D, 784, 800, 805, 882, 982, 984, 986, 1000, 1015, 1100, 1105, 1110, 1200, 1250, 1282, 1450, 1512, 1604, 1605, 1606, 1610, 1615, 1620, 1650, 1710, 1711, 1712, 1806, 1810, 1811, 1812, 1912, 1914.